lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From"Axel Dine" <>
Subjecti2o vs dpt-i2o
DateThu, 14 Jul 2005 23:20:24 -1000
Hi list,
I have an Adaptec 2110S controller on an A7M266-D dual AMD Athlon MP
rig running a Debian Sarge 3.1 stable.

I am considering which driver between i2o and dpt-i2o using: according
to your experience which one is preferrable performance and reliably
wise?

I have installed the i2o native driver and the linux kernel change the
order of my disk (like /dev/sda became /dev/i2o/hdc): is there any way to
have a consistent drive order (i.e. /dev/sda -> /dev/i2o/hdc)?

Last question: I started with the dpt-i2o and installed grub on the first
disk array, then I moved to the i2o native driver (statically compiled in
the kernel), without appling any patch and everything runs smoothly: how is
this possible? I would have expected some errors with frub not recognizing
the /dev/i2o/hdx devices.

Ciao
AxeL


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-15 11:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2009