![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Saturday 02 July 2005 02:06, Andrew Morton wrote: > Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote: > > On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > Well I can fix the reject if we decide that > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but > it seems that there's no need. > > However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables > > crash, and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok. > OK.. > Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch? I have a "keep this in -mm" > sign next to it. Well, wait a bit for that... I'll be publishing that out in my patchset, so we'll get wider testing. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-07-02 02:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||