![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote: > > On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote: > > > This patch implements something very close to skas mode for hosts > > > which don't support skas - I'm calling this skas0. > > > > I note that this patch assumes that > > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is applied. > > You're fixing the conflict anyway since it's little, correct? Well I can fix the reject if we decide that uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but it seems that there's no need. > However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables crash, > and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok. OK.. Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch? I have a "keep this in -mm" sign next to it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-07-02 00:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||