Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:59:48 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 16:50 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:34:11PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > Midway through the recent "RT patch acceptance" thread, someone mentioned > > > that it might be good to summarize the various approaches. The following > > > is an attempt to do just this, with an eye to providing a reasonable > > > framework for future discussion. > > > > > > Thoughts? Errors? Omissions? > > > > I haven't finished it, but it looks great so far. Are you planning to > > repost it to LKML, or otherwise publish it somewhere, after incorporating > > feedback? > > Glad you like it! > > I figured on sending out an update sometime next week, after incorporating > feedback.
I believe you are too friendly to vanilla + CONFIG_PREEMPT. People are still seeing tens or hundreds of ms bumps.
Does the LTP include an RT latency test yet?
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |