lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 16:50 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
    > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:34:11PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
    > > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
    > > > Hello!
    > > >
    > > > Midway through the recent "RT patch acceptance" thread, someone mentioned
    > > > that it might be good to summarize the various approaches. The following
    > > > is an attempt to do just this, with an eye to providing a reasonable
    > > > framework for future discussion.
    > > >
    > > > Thoughts? Errors? Omissions?
    > >
    > > I haven't finished it, but it looks great so far. Are you planning to
    > > repost it to LKML, or otherwise publish it somewhere, after incorporating
    > > feedback?
    >
    > Glad you like it!
    >
    > I figured on sending out an update sometime next week, after incorporating
    > feedback.

    I believe you are too friendly to vanilla + CONFIG_PREEMPT. People are
    still seeing tens or hundreds of ms bumps.

    Does the LTP include an RT latency test yet?

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-10 05:04    [W:0.023 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site