![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew James Wade <ajwade@cpe00095b3131a0-cm0011ae8cd564.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com> wrote: > > On June 8, 2005 05:26 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Were there no interesting printks before this BUG hit? > Nope :-( > > > It's due to the kernel running list_del() on a list_head which isn't on a list. > > > > Seems there is an error-path bug in that driver, but I don' thtink the fix > > will fix it. Please test? > Will do. But I don't think that's it. I've been adding printks to determine the > execution path and it goes through the ERROR3 path in asb100_detect(), which means > AFACT that the error path in asb100_detect_subclients() isn't taken: > > ERROR3: > i2c_detach_client(data->lm75[0]); > kfree(data->lm75[1]); > kfree(data->lm75[0]); > ERROR2: > i2c_detach_client(new_client); // <--- BUG() in here. > ERROR1: > kfree(data); > ERROR0: > return err; hm, the tree I have here doesn't do that. What kernel do you have there? I suggest you work against http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/x.bz2 which is a patch against 2.6.12-rc6 containing everybody's latest everything. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-08 23:41 [W:0.400 / U:0.080 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||