lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] capabilities not inherited
    * Manfred Georg (mgeorg@arl.wustl.edu) wrote:
    > I was working with passing capabilities through an exec and it
    > didn't do what I expected it to. That is, if I set a bit in
    > the inherited capabilities, it is not "inherited" after an
    > exec(). After going through the code many times, and still not
    > understanding it, I hacked together this patch. It probably
    > has unforseen side effects and there was probably some
    > reason it was not done in the first place.

    True to both. If you'd like to work with this, check the archives for
    similar patches. Most recent in a thread from Alex Nyberg starting
    here:

    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111062795600730&w=2

    thanks,
    -chris
    --
    Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-08 22:49    [W:0.021 / U:29.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site