![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 6/7/05, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote: > If the driver has to _undo_ something that it did not do, that's pretty > lame. Non-orthogonal. I would think the number of MSI and MSI-X capable devices is going to explode over the next five years. I'm not sure it's right to make all these device's drivers pay a complexity cost because some of the first attempted MSI implementations were buggy. > Also, it looks like all the PCI MSI drivers need touching for this > scheme -- which defeats the original intention. At this rate, the best > API is the one we've already got. For now...but I'm bringing this up again in five years!! *sets egg timer* -- Andy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-08 06:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||