![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> What PM toplevel core changes are you referring to? I've look over the > changes to pm_ops and they seem to make sense. Still I almost wonder if > we should make the entire thing arch specific code, and then have this > code call things like device_suspend(). If mac hardware required that > many new hooks, then other platforms might require even more. That is exactly the debate. Patrick thinks the whole thing should be arch code and kernel/power/* just provices "library" routines to call (like the freezer, swsusp stuff, etc...), Pavel wants to share as much code as possible in a single place. I have no real strong preference, I tend to be a bit more on Patrick's side here. I can do either way, but we need to decide. On one case, I would do a patch removing most of kernel/power/main.c and disk.c (they are mostly redundant anyway) and replacing with a simple mecanism where the arch provides a table of state names + function to call for sysfs. On the other case, just merge my patch adding all the new hooks. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-07 04:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||