![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:21:59AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > IIRC (from the comment above) several chipsets suffer from this > > inconsistency, namely the widely used PIIX4(E) and ICH(4 only? or also other > > ICH-ones?). Therefore, we'd need at least some sort of boot-time check to > > decide which method to use... and based on the method, we can adjust the > > priority maybe? > > At least on x86-64 there are no ICH4s or PIIX4Es. Actually I think > there was one early prototype machine from Intel with ICH4, but I am willing > to ignore these. So please dont do any such things on the x86-64 version. > > Also didnt ICH4 already have HPET? it might not be enabled on many > boxes, but given the chip datasheet one can write enable code to > fix that. At least on my notebook, which has an ICH4-M, there is no HPET. AFAIK it resides on a separate chip which may or may not exist. I'd be glad if the opposite were true, though :) Dominik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-06 09:29 [W:0.478 / U:0.010 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||