lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 6 Jun 2005 11:21:59 +0200
FromAndi Kleen <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
> IIRC (from the comment above) several chipsets suffer from this
> inconsistency, namely the widely used PIIX4(E) and ICH(4 only? or also other
> ICH-ones?). Therefore, we'd need at least some sort of boot-time check to
> decide which method to use... and based on the method, we can adjust the
> priority maybe?

At least on x86-64 there are no ICH4s or PIIX4Es. Actually I think
there was one early prototype machine from Intel with ICH4, but I am willing
to ignore these.  So please dont do any such things on the x86-64 version.

Also didnt ICH4 already have HPET? it might not be enabled on many
boxes, but given the chip datasheet one can write enable code to 
fix that.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-06 09:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2008