Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:32:07 +1000 | From | Nathan Scott <> | Subject | Re: XFS and 2.6.12-rc5 |
| |
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:56:24AM +0200, Goran Gajic wrote: > >Also, the diagnostic will contain an inode number - for bonus points > >run "xfs_db -r -c 'inode XXX' -c print /dev/foo" and send me that as > >well. Thanks! > > You are right about message here it is: > > xfs_db -r -c 'inode 448631586' -c print /dev/sdb1 > ... > u.bmx[0-3] = [startoff,startblock,blockcount,extentflag] > 0:[177,2557931,341,0] 1:[18014398509481983,4498651825045504,0,1] > 2:[15184073051865088,0,0,0] 3:[0,1422,1245184,0] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is the guy - startblock being zero is fatal. You'll need to run xfs_repair to clear that up. If you know how it got in that state, I'd be keen to hear it, or if it persists after repair.
[Arun, those superblock checks you added awhile back should be shutting down the filesystem, not panicing the system, I think? It looks like theres a signedness issue in the diagnostics too.]
> Turning off cron.daily stops this message so I guess you are right.
Repairing that inode should make it go away entirely.
cheers.
-- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |