lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 06 Jun 2005 19:53:55 -0400
FromJeff Garzik <>
SubjectRe: pci_enable_msi() for everyone?
Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:08:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>Greg KH wrote:>>>>>Why would it matter?  The driver shouldn't care if the interrupts come
>>>in via the standard interrupt way, or through MSI, right?  And if it>>>>It matters.>>>>Not only the differences DaveM mentioned, but also simply that you may 
>>assume your interrupt is not shared with anyone else.> > > Ok, and again, how would the call, pci_in_msi_mode(struct pci_dev *dev)
> not allow for the driver to determine this?

Let me see if I understand this correctly :)

A technology (MSI) allows one to more efficiently call interrupt 
handlers, with fewer bus reads...  and you want to add a test to each 
interrupt handler -- a test which adds several bus reads to the hot path 
of every MSI driver?

We want to -decrease- the overhead involved with an interrupt, but 
pci_in_msi_mode() increases it.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-07 00:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2008