![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:mingo@elte.hu] > >so the question is - can we have an extreme (larger than 140) number of >RT tasks? If yes, why are they all RT - they can have no expectation of >good latencies with a possible load factor of 140! In practice, didn't we want most tasks to behave like RT? (for interactivity purposes) -- I recall hearing that's basically what good interactivity meant; short reponse times to events. So then, taking await batch/bacground data-munching jobs, we fold back to needing a good RT-like behaviour. And then we can reach > 140. -- Inaky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-06 07:54 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||