lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes

    * Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

    > For me it's strictly a speed question. I was reviewing
    > V0.7.40-04 and it looks like apples and oranges to me. It's more a
    > question of where do you perfer the latency , in up() or in down() ..
    > plist is slower for non-RT tasks, but non-RT tasks also get the
    > benefit of priority ordering.

    what benefit do non-RT tasks get from plists, compared to the ordered
    list? Non-RT tasks are not PI handled in any way.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-06 09:51    [W:0.029 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site