lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes

* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

> For me it's strictly a speed question. I was reviewing
> V0.7.40-04 and it looks like apples and oranges to me. It's more a
> question of where do you perfer the latency , in up() or in down() ..
> plist is slower for non-RT tasks, but non-RT tasks also get the
> benefit of priority ordering.

what benefit do non-RT tasks get from plists, compared to the ordered
list? Non-RT tasks are not PI handled in any way.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-06 09:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans