lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 6 Jun 2005 09:44:58 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

> 	For me it's strictly a speed question. I was reviewing 
> V0.7.40-04 and it looks like apples and oranges to me. It's more a 
> question of where do you perfer the latency , in up() or in down() .. 
> plist is slower for non-RT tasks, but non-RT tasks also get the 
> benefit of priority ordering.

what benefit do non-RT tasks get from plists, compared to the ordered 
list? Non-RT tasks are not PI handled in any way.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-06 07:51    [W:0.745 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans