![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 10:32 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 17:53 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > I already released a patch to fix this. > > Nice to know. Where ? > Ingo pointed me at the patch. Sorry, but I really don't see the release there. > The first time I saw these latencies I has the PI abstraction applied, and > the most recent time I had the attached patch applied only. This patch is > small so I'm not sure if it could have that type of effect on task > latency. It fixes a problem and uncovers others, but your comment is more a question than an explanation for the urgency of the fix. In fact the original implementation leads to solid deadlocks in plist_for_each_safe() loops. I really can't blame Ingo for ignoring this. tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-05 10:56 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||