![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:34:59AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 03:16:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:29:31AM +0200, Herbert Rosmanith wrote: > (...) > > > alessandro suardi told me that this problem is solved using the > > > patch from: > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.4-seg-4.patch > > > > > > which are dated from march (2005-03-27) and therefore, about 3 months > > > old. > > > > > > it's about time this gets into the official kernel. who is in charge > > > of it? (it's obviously not sufficient to report to lkml). > > > > Looks OK except that one "movl" conversion was forgotten in > > the x86-64 diff: > > > > @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t > > } > > { > > unsigned gsindex; > > - asm volatile("movl %%gs,%0" : "=g" (gsindex)); > > + asm volatile("movl %%gs,%0" : "=r" (gsindex)); > > if (unlikely((gsindex | next->gsindex) || prev->gs)) { > > > > Who wrote the patch? > > I believe it's H.J. Lu (CC'd). > Is there a problem? H.J. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-06 01:52 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||