lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3

* Kristian Benoit <kbenoit@opersys.com> wrote:

> "plain" run:
>
> Measurements | Vanilla | preemp_rt |
> ---------------+-------------+----------------+
> fork | 93us | 157us (+69%) |
> open/close | 2.3us | 3.7us (+43%) |
> execve | 351us | 446us (+27%) |
> select 500fd | 12.7us | 25.8us (+103%) |
> mmap | 660us | 2867us (+334%) |
> pipe | 7.1us | 11.6us (+63%) |

update: these tests should perform significantly better on the freshly
released -50-37 (or later) PREEMPT_RT kernels. (fork, execve, mmap [*]
was improved in -50-36, the others in -50-37)

Ingo

[*] the extent of the above fork/execve/mmap costs is still unexplained,
unless the test was run with HIGHMEM64 and HIGHPTE enabled.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-30 19:03    [W:0.089 / U:2.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site