[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kmalloc without GFP_xxx?
On Wed, Jun 29 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> So why can't we have kmalloc_auto(size) which does GFP_KERNEL alloc
> if called from non-atomic context and GFP_ATOMIC one otherwise?

Because it's a lot better in generel if we force people to think about
what they are doing wrt memory allocations. You should know if you are
able to block or not, a lot of functions exported require you to have
this knowledge anyways. Adding these auto-detection type functions
encourages bad programming, imho.

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-29 13:19    [W:0.064 / U:11.876 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site