lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kmalloc without GFP_xxx?
On Wed, Jun 29 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> So why can't we have kmalloc_auto(size) which does GFP_KERNEL alloc
> if called from non-atomic context and GFP_ATOMIC one otherwise?

Because it's a lot better in generel if we force people to think about
what they are doing wrt memory allocations. You should know if you are
able to block or not, a lot of functions exported require you to have
this knowledge anyways. Adding these auto-detection type functions
encourages bad programming, imho.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-29 13:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site