[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] freevxfs: minor cleanups
    (Please don't trim the cc list when replying.)

    Pekka Enberg wrote:
    > > The rationale for this is that since NULL is not guaranteed to be zero
    > > by the C standard

    On 6/29/05, Matthias Urlichs <> wrote:
    > ... as opposed to the other 632719 places in the kernel source where
    > we do the exact same thing?

    Well, as silly as it sounds to you, that _was_ the rationale for NTFS.
    I actually like it better than using kcalloc() but at the end of the
    day, I care more that the kernel uses same idioms all over. Makes the
    code easier to understand for my tiny brain...

    P.S. Those 632719 places can be fixed too with a handful of persistent
    kernel janitors ;)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-29 10:06    [W:0.020 / U:40.912 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site