![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > Ingo, what's the status of putting irq 0 back in a thread with > PREEMPT_RT? IIRC this had some adverse (maybe unfixable?) effects so > it was disabled a few months ago. the jury is still out on that one - but right now it seems it's too much complexity for a handful of usecs of latency improvement. Especially with things like high-resolution timer support, the threading IRQ0 doesnt seem to be worth it. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-29 07:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||