lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 29 Jun 2005 15:59:27 -0700
FromHans Reiser <>
SubjectRe: reiser4 merging action list
Pekka Enberg wrote:

>Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
>
>>>There's also the custom list, hash and debug code.  We should either
>>>
>>>a) remove them or
>>>
>>>b) generify them and submit as standalone works or
>>>
>>>c) justify them as custom-to-reiser4 and leave them as-is.
>>> 
>>>
>
>On 6/29/05, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
> 
>
>>either b) or c) is ok with me for the list code.  The debug code should
>>be c) I think.
>>
>>Probably vs can offer a more detailed and accurate opinion,
>> 
>>
>
>I completely agree that the current state of the generic hashing
>facilities is somewhat poor but I fail to see why you can't use
><linux/list.h>.
> 
>
I'll let vs and maybe nikita comment.

>As for the debugging code, I would love to see that turned into
>something generic (every subsystem has their own now) but it is
>definitely not something that should stop you from merging.
>
>                                Pekka
>
>
> 
>
If I encourage you to make a patch, is that ok of me? 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-30 01:04    [from the cache]
©2003-2008