lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
    Date
    On Jun 28, 2005, at 18:59:28, Sean wrote:
    > By the sounds of it, git could just use Mecurial or some variation
    > thereof
    > as a back end.

    Umm, you seem to miss the point, sir. If you use Mercurial, there is no
    reason you should layer any part of Git on top of it. It already does
    everything that git does anyways.

    > Git is already so much better for the things I do than BK ever was,
    > I'll
    > stick with it.

    This is like saying "Windows 3.1 is already so much better for the
    things
    I do than DOS ever was, I'll stick with it." :-D

    Cheers,
    Kyle Moffett

    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
    Version: 3.12
    GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$
    L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+
    PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$
    r !y?(-)
    ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-29 03:49    [W:9.521 / U:1.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site