[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectSwap partition vs swap file
    Is there any significant difference these days between a swap
    partition and a swap file?

    An exhaustive Google search turns up several conflicting answers. The
    consensus seems to be that a swap partition is more efficient than a
    swap file, but whether or not the difference is noteworthy is never
    definitively answered.

    For the sake of argument, let's assume you've got modern hardware with
    ample RAM and a recent kernel (a late 2.4.x or 2.6.x), and that under
    normal conditions you never seeing more than 50-100MB of swap used.

    Given this situation, is there any significant performance or
    stability advantage to using a swap partition instead of a swap file?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-29 03:11    [W:0.019 / U:33.328 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site