Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:30:53 +1000 | From | Peter Williams <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice |
| |
Con Kolivas wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:43, Peter Williams wrote: > >>Con Kolivas wrote: >> >>>This patch improves throughput with the smp nice balancing code. Many >>>thanks to Martin Bligh for the usage of his regression testing bed to >>>confirm the effectiveness of various patches. >> >>Con, >> This doesn't build on non SMP systems due to the migration_thread field >>only being defined for SMP. Attached is a copy of a slightly modified >>PlugSched version of the patch which I used to fix the problem in >>PlugSched. Even though it's for a different file it should be easy to >>copy over. > > > Peter > > Look at the actual patch I sent out you'll see it moved the ifdefs up to > compensate. I believe your port of my patch doesn't build and I suspect it's > because you missed these ifdef movements ;)
Yes, I should have read the patch more carefully.
Sorry about that, Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |