![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 08:26:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> drop_inode is not going to die, we need it to support filesystems that
> want to call generic_delete_inode even for a non-null i_nlink. What's
> hopefully going to die is the last instance of it that isn't either
> generic_drop_inode or generic_delete_inode.
OCFS2 uses drop_inode as well, as it must handle last-close when
another node did the unlink. It fixes up i_nlink in that case, then
calls generic_drop_inode().
If there's a more elegant solution, we're all ears.
Joel
--
"When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one
I've never tried before."
- Mae West
Joel Becker
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-27 21:52 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||