[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: reiser4 plugins
    On Llu, 2005-06-27 at 10:18, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
    > Sure, "other people merge design-breakers and bugs" is NOT a justification
    > for merging Reiser4, of course, but Reiser4's track record has vastly
    > cleaned itself up.

    The discussion is about merging from -mm, not into -mm. The merge into
    -mm isn't at all under discussion so I don't the relevance of the

    > 0. Namesys addresses the code beautification reqs mentioned here earlier.
    > 1. Merge Reiser4 sans metas into 2.6.13.
    > 2. Namesys can have a separate metas patch for testing.
    > 3. Gradually merge Reiser4 architecture into VFS and if this really
    > requires a 2.7, as (iirc) Valdis Kletnieks suggested, make it so.
    > Might do the rest of the kernel some good too.

    0 and 1 look like the first right steps to take to me as well. That will
    allow people to use reiser4 and give it a good hammering see what comes
    out and how it benches in real life.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-27 19:09    [W:0.019 / U:5.276 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site