Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:40:24 -0400 | From | Gene Heskett <> | Subject | Re: [CFT:PATCH] 2/3: Check status of CTS when using flow control |
| |
On Monday 27 June 2005 04:05, Russell King wrote: >On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 07:38:18PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Sunday 26 June 2005 18:37, Russell King wrote: >> >On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:26:43PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> On Sunday 26 June 2005 18:17, Russell King wrote: >> >> >Fix bugme #4712: read the CTS status and set hw_stopped if CTS >> >> >is not active. >> >> > >> >> >Thanks to Stefan Wolff for spotting this problem. >> >> >> >> This one needs to make mainline & maybe, after 3 years, I can >> >> use a pl2303 to talk to an old slow coco. Twould be very nice >> >> if that fixed the lack of flow controls the connection >> >> apparently fails from. >> > >> >Sorry, wasn't aware of the problem until recently. Reviewing the >> >code reveals that this bug has existed through many many many >> > kernel series. ;( >> >> Yes it has, and I may have even posted about it, but that would be >> a year plus back into ancient history Russell. You mention >> another required patch also? Where might it be obtained? > >You replied to the second message in the thread (which contains the >second patch). The first message contains the first patch. > lkml.org has it archived if you need it.
Ok, found all 3 of them in this thread and saved them. From my own kmail archive. Thanks. I'll merge them into one file and see if it will apply when I build the next of Ingo's RT bleeders.
>> >(also, please remember I can't send you mail directly... still.) >> >> I'm also getting bounces involving the address in the CC: line, >> Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> >> >> While I can goto vz and add that address to the incoming >> whitelist, I doubt that would do you any good. Looks like I need >> to bookmark that page and start using it more often. Did I >> mention how bad vz sucks? Unforch, only game in this neck of the >> appalacians (hell I can't even spell it right), sorry. >> >> Anyway, your domain name is now in the vz whitelist. > >And I now have 20 messages from verizon to postmaster / abuse > requesting that I go and fill in their "ISP" whitelist form... one > to each would have done, but 10 times as much? That's definitely > abuse in itself.
Amen to that!
>On this ISP whitelist form, Verizon require a phonenumber that they > can call anytime during some random timezone (CST, where ever that > is.) Being located in the UK, that's not acceptable so I'm unable > to comply with their requirements for whitelisting. Sorry.
That tz would be america-chicago in the tz list. Since I'm a (captive) customer, I apparently don't have to go thru that BS. But that should be taken care of as I get the impression that my whitelisting you should be for *my* incoming. Give it one more shot & see if it still makes a bounce message to you now. I put your domain into the whitelist yesterday. I also shut off vz's so called spam filter as SA seems to be catching far more than theirs ever did.
-- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |