Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status | From | Nikita Danilov <> | Date | Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:03:24 +0400 |
| |
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> writes:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:23:41 -0700, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> said: > >>>> assert("trace_hash-89", is_hashed(foo) != 0); > >> Lots of people like corporate anonymity. Some don't. I don't. I >> like knowing who wrote what. ... > > For what it's worth (I know: not much), I like the named asserts in > Reiser4/Reiserfs. Although I haven't been bitten by any BUGs yet (maybe > I'm just lucky), whenever I see these on the mailing list, it gives the > impression that the users are interacting more directly with the > developers, and it helps us to get to know the developers better. > > If people really want more standard-looking identifiers, I think Namesys > should keep the names and make a hybrid identifier, like > "nikita-123(<file>:<line>)"
This already happens: together with <uid>-<serial>, reiser4 outputs __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, and a bunch of other stuff:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- reiser4[xine(11262)]: txn_end (fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:504)[nominaodiosasunt-2967]: code: -2 at fs/reiser4/search.c:1285 reiser4 panicked cowardly: assertion failed: lock_stack_isclean(get_current_lock_stack()) ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nikita. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |