[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: reiser4 plugins
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 05:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Hans Reiser <> wrote:
> > What is wrong with having an encryption plugin implemented in this
> > manner? What is wrong with being able to have some files implemented
> > using a compression plugin, and others in the same filesystem not.
> >
> > What is wrong with having one file in the FS use a write only plugin, in
> > which the encrypion key is changed with every append in a forward but
> > not backward computable manner, and in order to read a file you must
> > either have a key that is stored on another computer or be reading what
> > was written after the moment of cracking root?
> >
> > What is wrong with having a set of critical data files use a CRC
> > checking file plugin?
> I think the concern here is that this is implemented at the wrong level.

> In Linux, a filesystem is some dumb thing which implements
> address_space_operations, filesystem_operations, etc.

It is not so already. XFS, FUSE, network fs are not of that type.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-25 21:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean