Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:11:59 +0100 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: reiser4 plugins |
| |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:49:51PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > Regarding trust, Christophe comes out the gate using the words "useless > abstraction layer" that happens to be a core feature of our design, > demanding we cut it out, and not really understanding it or recognizing > any functionality it provides, and you can't really expect me to respect > this, can you? > > Now, if his target is reduced to whether we can eliminate a function > indirection, and whether we can review the code together and see if it > is easy to extend plugins and pluginids to other filesystems by finding > places to make it more generic and accepting of per filesystem plugins, > especially if it is not tied to going into 2.6.13, well, that is the > conversation I would have liked to have had.
Have I missed the posting with analysis of changes in locking scheme and update of proof of correctness? If so, please give the message ID.
_That_ had been the major showstopper for any merges, IIRC. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |