lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction
    From
    From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
    Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:03:45 -0700 (PDT)

    > Ok. Then we are done. With 58 Itanium processors and 200G Ram I get
    > more than 10% improvement ;-). With 500 tasks we have 453 vs. 499 j/m/t.
    > That is 9.21%. For 300 tasks we have 9.4% etc. I am sure that I can push
    > this some more with bigger counts of processors and also some other NUMA
    > related performance issues.

    So it took 7 times more processors to increase the performance gain by
    just over 3 on a microscopic synthetic benchmark. That's not
    impressive at all.

    And you still haven't shown what happens for the workloads I
    suggested. A web benchmark, with say a thousand unique clients, would
    be sufficient for one of those btw. That case has very low dst
    locality, yet dsts are useful because you'll have about 2 or 3
    concurrent connections per dst.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-24 08:22    [W:0.024 / U:154.772 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site