lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
Chris Mason wrote:

>On Friday 24 June 2005 00:59, jmerkey wrote:
>
>
>>Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>It's a GBD replacement and is not fully open source.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>What is not open source in it ()?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>KDB is at present more capable. It has a lot of promise, but it does not
>>>>have the all the architectural
>>>>features necessary to replace either KDB or GDB at present.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>While I never used or saw kdb, I'd be curious about what you immediately
>>>saw missing...
>>>
>>>
>>1. No back trace
>>2. Doesn't run standalone fully embeded in the kernel
>>3. Not fully open source (since it's not embeded in the kernel)
>>4. IA64 doesn't really matter, since IA64 is basically dead anyway
>>5. No advanced recursive descent parser for conditional breakpoints
>>
>>
>
>This is more or less completely inaccurate.
>
>
>

Which one -- more ? or less ?

Jeff

>-chris
>
>
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-24 19:08    [W:0.072 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site