Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:55:39 -0600 | From | jmerkey <> | Subject | Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD) |
| |
Chris Mason wrote:
>On Friday 24 June 2005 00:59, jmerkey wrote: > > >>Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> >>>>It's a GBD replacement and is not fully open source. >>>> >>>> >>>What is not open source in it ()? >>> >>> >>> >>>>KDB is at present more capable. It has a lot of promise, but it does not >>>>have the all the architectural >>>>features necessary to replace either KDB or GDB at present. >>>> >>>> >>>While I never used or saw kdb, I'd be curious about what you immediately >>>saw missing... >>> >>> >>1. No back trace >>2. Doesn't run standalone fully embeded in the kernel >>3. Not fully open source (since it's not embeded in the kernel) >>4. IA64 doesn't really matter, since IA64 is basically dead anyway >>5. No advanced recursive descent parser for conditional breakpoints >> >> > >This is more or less completely inaccurate. > > >
Which one -- more ? or less ?
Jeff
>-chris > > > > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |