Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Hubert Chan <> | | Subject | Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status | | Date | Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:13:01 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:37:05 -0400, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.de> said:
> As someone who spends time debugging reiser3 issues, I've grown > accustomed to the named assertions. They make discussing a particular > assertion much more natural in conversation than file:line. It also > makes difficult to reproduce assertions more trackable over time. The > assertion number never changes, but the line number can with even the > most trivial of patches.
How about something of the form "nikita-955(file:line)"? Or the reverse: "file:line(nikita-955)". Would that keep everyone happy?
-- Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |