lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
Date
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:37:05 -0400, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.de> said:

> As someone who spends time debugging reiser3 issues, I've grown
> accustomed to the named assertions. They make discussing a particular
> assertion much more natural in conversation than file:line. It also
> makes difficult to reproduce assertions more trackable over time. The
> assertion number never changes, but the line number can with even the
> most trivial of patches.

How about something of the form "nikita-955(file:line)"? Or the
reverse: "file:line(nikita-955)". Would that keep everyone happy?

--
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-24 03:20    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site