lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
    On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Karim Yaghmour wrote:

    > To be honest, however, I have a very hard time, as a user, to
    > convince myself that I should enable preempt_rt under any but
    > the most dire situations given the results I now have in front
    > of me. Surely there's more of an argument than "this will cost
    > you as much as SMP" for someone deploying UP systems, which
    > apparently is the main target of preempt_rt with things like
    > audio and embedded systems.

    What situation do you consider dire?

    I do appreciate the testing that you've done and I hope you do more in the
    future. Remember that PREEMPT_RT is a fast moving object, we need those
    kinds of tests every day ..


    Daniel

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-23 02:16    [W:3.876 / U:0.324 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site