Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:16:39 -0400 | From | Karim Yaghmour <> | Subject | Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2 |
| |
Paul E. McKenney wrote: > (And, yes, there are other CDFs lacking a 30us bulge that would be > consistent with a 55us "blue-moon" bulge -- so I guess I am asking > if you have the CDF or the raw latency measurements -- though the > data set might be a bit large... And I would have to think about > how one goes about deriving individual-latency CDF(s) given a single > dual-latency CDF, assuming that this is even possible...)
This is a bandwidth issue. The compressed archive containing the interrupt latencies of all our test runs is 100MB. I could provide a URL _privately_ to a handful of individuals, but beyond that someone's going to have to host it.
Let me know if you want this.
Of course, now that LRTBF is out there, others can generate their own data sets.
Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |