lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-V0.7.49-00
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> * Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk> wrote:
>
> > Yep, just as I pressed sent before I saw the following:
>
> ok, i'll have to look at the latency trace of this.
>
> > threshold violated: 28.0% (273usec)
>
> btw., are you sure this happened with latency timing/tracing disabled?
> (the printks will disturb the rtc_wakeup test).
>
Yes.
But I have been running the same load with latence timing on and have not
seen traces of more than ~50us.

I do have problems with calibration of the clock in both rtc_wakeup and
realfeel2 due to frequency scaling, but it looks like if I have a cpu-hog
running it settles itself on the 697MHz as it should. But could this
frequency scaling lead to bad readings? If it for some reason scales down
the clock during a test it ought to give lower clock counts than the real
ones, not higher...

> Ingo
>

Esben


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-22 11:01    [W:0.117 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site