Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:44:55 -0700 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status |
| |
vs and zam, please comment on what we get from our profiler and spinlock debugger that the standard tools don't supply. I am sure you have a reason, but now is the time to articulate it.
We would like to keep the disabled code in there until we have a chance to prove (or fail to prove) that cycle detection can be resolved effectively, and then with a solution in hand argue its merits.
Hans
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Also I'm not sure things like comming with an own profiler > >and spinlock debugger are really acceptable. At least this stuff >should be removed too. > >-Andi > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |