[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (HZ -> 250?)
    On Maw, 2005-06-21 at 17:26, Lee Revell wrote:
    > Consider a program with a 5ms RT constraint, like a game or mplayer.
    > Currently it uses the RTC on 2.4/HZ=100 systems and usleep() on
    > 2.6/HZ=1000. Allowing HZ to regress to 250 would force us to handle
    > 2.4, 2.6.1 - 2.6.12, and 2.6.13+ separately. It would be a huge mess.

    Vendors already ship 100Hz and 1KHz kernels. 2.4 and 2.6 are different
    already. I can see the argument for not picking another new value
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-21 20:15    [W:0.018 / U:14.972 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site