![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:54:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> vm-early-zone-reclaim
>
> Needs some convincing benchmark numbers to back it up. Otherwise OK.
The only benchmarks I have for this were included in my last mail to
linux-mm:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=111763597218177&w=2
Are they convincing? Well, the patch doesn't seem to make the memory
thrashing case much worse ("make -j" kernbench run) which is a good
thing since the VM is trying to reclaim much earlier.
In the same e-mail I mention that there is a fairly good performance
gain in the optimal case, where processes are tied to a single node and
the node's memory is filled with page cache. With zone reclaim turned
on the "make -j8" kernel build runs in 700 seconds; 735 seconds with
no reclaim.
mh
--
Martin Hicks Wild Open Source Inc.
mort@wildopensource.com 613-266-2296
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-21 16:18 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||