lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
DateMon, 20 Jun 2005 23:49:27 +0200
From domen@coderock ...
Subject[patch 4/4] arm/cpu-sa1110: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>



Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task
delays as expected. Neither signals nor wait-queue events are important at this
point in the code, I believe.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---
cpu-sa1110.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: quilt/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c
===================================================================
--- quilt.orig/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c
+++ quilt/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c
@@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_
*/
sdram_set_refresh(2);
if (!irqs_disabled()) {
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(20 * HZ / 1000);
+ msleep(20);
} else {
mdelay(20);
}
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-21 00:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2010