Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:49:27 +0200 | From | domen@coderock ... | Subject | [patch 4/4] arm/cpu-sa1110: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() |
| |
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays as expected. Neither signals nor wait-queue events are important at this point in the code, I believe.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org> --- cpu-sa1110.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: quilt/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c =================================================================== --- quilt.orig/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c +++ quilt/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c @@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_ */ sdram_set_refresh(2); if (!irqs_disabled()) { - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - schedule_timeout(20 * HZ / 1000); + msleep(20); } else { mdelay(20); } -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |