Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:31:37 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/2] vm early reclaim orphaned pages (take 2) |
| |
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > How about this? >
It might be good, it's hard to tell.
Performance testing is needed.
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/swap.c 2004-12-25 08:34:31.000000000 +1100 > +++ linux-2.6/mm/swap.c 2005-06-20 17:20:28.216728238 +1000 > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ > spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags); > if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page)) { > list_del(&page->lru); > - list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->inactive_list); > + list_move_tail(&page->lru, &zone->inactive_list); > inc_page_state(pgrotated); > } > if (!test_clear_page_writeback(page)) > @@ -97,6 +97,32 @@ > }
Correctness testing is needed too ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |