Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 19 Jun 2005 00:52:38 +0200 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad? |
| |
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 03:49:33PM -0700, David L wrote: > [snip] > >On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote: > >> I'm seeing the message: > >> > >> bad: scheduling while atomic! > >> > >> I see this dozens of times when I'm writing to a nand flash device using > >a > >> vendor-provided driver from Compulab in 2.6.8.1. Does this mean the > >driver > >> has a bug or is incompatible with the preemptive configuration option? > >How > >> bad is "bad"? Should I turn of the preemption option, ignore the > >message, > >> or what? > > > >can you post the sourcecode of the driver? it needs fixing... > It's on-line at: > > http://www.compulab.co.il/686-developer.htm > > under "Linux - kernel, drivers and patches". > > After unzipping, it's in: > > Drivers & Patches 2.6/Flash Disk/cl_fdrv.tgz
that's only part of the source though... can you point at the full one ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |