Messages in this thread | | | From | David Lang <> | Date | Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:48:59 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.12 |
| |
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, aq wrote:
> the version number is a little bit confused here: if I want to upgrade > from for example 2.6.11.5 to 2.6.12, which patch should I get?
you reverse the 2.6.11 -> 2.6.11.5 patch to get back to a vinilla 2.6.11 then you apply the 2.6.11->2.6.12 patch.
David Lang
> anybody knows if Matt will upgrade his ketchup for the new versioning > system soon? otherwise, I might spend some time to hack it up. > > regards, > aq > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
-- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C.A.R. Hoare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |