Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] SELinux: memory leak in selinux_sb_copy_data() | From | Gerald Schaefer <> | Date | Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:18:16 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:57 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > Shouldn't that be nosec_save? nosec is advanced by take_option(). > That's right, I muddled that up. Hope I got this one-line patch right this time...
diff -pruN linux-2.6-git/security/selinux/hooks.c linux-2.6-git_xxx/security/selinux/hooks.c --- linux-2.6-git/security/selinux/hooks.c 2005-06-16 20:01:03.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6-git_xxx/security/selinux/hooks.c 2005-06-17 14:38:08.000000000 +0200 @@ -1945,6 +1945,7 @@ static int selinux_sb_copy_data(struct f } while (*in_end++); copy_page(in_save, nosec_save); + free_page((unsigned long)nosec_save); out: return rc; } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |