Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:21:55 +0200 | From | Voluspa <> | Subject | 2.6.12-rc6 missing commit(s) in cpufreq? |
| |
According to: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.12-rc6
There should be a:
commit 1206aaac285904e3e3995eecbf4129b6555a8973 Author: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date: Tue May 31 19:03:48 2005 -0700
[CPUFREQ] Allow ondemand stepping to be changed by user.
And when I look at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/davej/cpufreq.git;a=commit;h=1206aaac285904e3e3995eecbf4129b6555a8973
There are changes in the diff like:
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c +++ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct dbs_tuners { unsigned int up_threshold; unsigned int down_threshold; unsigned int ignore_nice; + unsigned int freq_step; };
Problem is that neither a clean 2.6.11 patched with patch-2.6.12-rc6 nor a full linux-2.6.12-rc6.tar.bz (I just downloaded it) contain that commit.
The first example from above looks like:
struct dbs_tuners { unsigned int sampling_rate; unsigned int sampling_down_factor; unsigned int up_threshold; unsigned int ignore_nice; }; Even more strange is the other discrepancies in that list, suggesting other missed commits. Live directory from 2.6.12-rc :
root:sleipner:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand# ls total 0 0 ignore_nice 0 sampling_rate 0 sampling_rate_min 0 sampling_down_factor 0 sampling_rate_max 0 up_threshold
Perhaps this is why I can't get the conservative governor to work at all (it just sits at the freq at which it was loaded, never going up/down no matter the load).
Mvh Mats Johannesson -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |