[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    Subject2.6.12-rc6 missing commit(s) in cpufreq?

    According to:

    There should be a:

    commit 1206aaac285904e3e3995eecbf4129b6555a8973
    Author: Dave Jones <>
    Date: Tue May 31 19:03:48 2005 -0700

    [CPUFREQ] Allow ondemand stepping to be changed by user.

    And when I look at:;a=commit;h=1206aaac285904e3e3995eecbf4129b6555a8973

    There are changes in the diff like:

    --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
    +++ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
    @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct dbs_tuners {
    unsigned int up_threshold;
    unsigned int down_threshold;
    unsigned int ignore_nice;
    + unsigned int freq_step;

    Problem is that neither a clean 2.6.11 patched with patch-2.6.12-rc6 nor
    a full (I just downloaded it) contain that

    The first example from above looks like:

    struct dbs_tuners {
    unsigned int sampling_rate;
    unsigned int sampling_down_factor;
    unsigned int up_threshold;
    unsigned int ignore_nice;
    Even more strange is the other discrepancies in that list, suggesting
    other missed commits. Live directory from 2.6.12-rc :

    root:sleipner:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand# ls
    total 0
    0 ignore_nice 0 sampling_rate 0 sampling_rate_min
    0 sampling_down_factor 0 sampling_rate_max 0 up_threshold

    Perhaps this is why I can't get the conservative governor to work at all
    (it just sits at the freq at which it was loaded, never going up/down no
    matter the load).

    Mats Johannesson
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-17 12:25    [W:0.019 / U:38.696 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site