[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SCHED_RR/SCHED_FIFO and kernel threads?
Chris Friesen wrote:

> Patrik Hägglund wrote:
>> Kernel threads seems to generally be scheduled in the SCHED_OTHER
>> class (with the 'migration' thread as an exception).
> This is on purpose. The idea is that realtime processes get all the
> time they request. If the kernel threads are interrupting the
> realtime app, then the latency of the realtime app is degraded.

Don't you get the problem with priority inversion? I.e., if you have two
processes, P1 and P2, scheduled with SCHED_FIFO, where P1 has higer
priority than P2. Now, if P1 gets blocked and needs some kernel thread
to execute to get unblocked, then P2 is scheduled before the kernel
thread, and can execute without any time limit.

That is, you should be much better off if the kernel threads has a
_high_ priority. Then the execution progress can only be blocked by
kernel threads, not by user space threads and processes. Or have I
missed something?

(Besides that, as I see it, SCHED_RR/SCHED_FIFO are scheduling
abstractions on their own, not necessarily connected to "low latency "
or "realtime".)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-17 08:42    [W:0.103 / U:1.320 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site