Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:48:56 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) | From | Reiner Sailer <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code |
| |
Serge E. Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com) wrote: > > That's true, of course. Reiner, would any of the integrity measurement > hooks be moved to a better place than the current LSM hooks? Is there a > preferred ordering - ie measurement should always happen before the LSM > modules, or always after? Either of these would of course be clear > reasons to separate IMA into its own subsystem. > > thanks, > -serge
Originally, IMA was not an LSM. However, when moving to a 2.6 kernel, we moved it to LSM and have found very easily the current hooks. I don't think the hook position would change when moving from LSM to non-LSM.
Thanks Reiner
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |