lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code

Serge E. Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com) wrote:
>
> That's true, of course. Reiner, would any of the integrity measurement
> hooks be moved to a better place than the current LSM hooks? Is there a
> preferred ordering - ie measurement should always happen before the LSM
> modules, or always after? Either of these would of course be clear
> reasons to separate IMA into its own subsystem.
>
> thanks,
> -serge

Originally, IMA was not an LSM. However, when moving to a 2.6 kernel, we
moved it to LSM and have found very easily the current hooks. I don't think
the hook position would change when moving from LSM to non-LSM.

Thanks
Reiner

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-16 00:56    [W:0.041 / U:1.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site