Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:55:08 +0200 | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | | Subject | Re: amd64 cdrom access locks system |
| |
[ Jens added to cc: ]
On 6/13/05, Jeff Wiegley <jeffw@cyte.com> wrote: > Andrew Morton said I should carbon copy the IDE developer on this > issue so I have in the hopes of re-opening this issue and making > some progress since I'm still unable to write anything with my > cd-burner. > > Here's what I know to date: > > I have the alim15x3 IDE driver installed and running. > I do NOT have any of the generic IDE drivers installed or > even compiled as they grossly interfere with the alim15x3 > and cause a kernel panic. > My hardware is an AMD64 FX55 in a Shuttle ST20G5 case with a > serial ATA harddrive. > I'm using a stock 2.6.12-rc6 kernel. > Debian unstable distribution. > > At first I can read from the drive fine. > For instance I did two "cdparanoia -B -d /dev/hda" without > a hitch. Nothing was reported in /var/log/kernel as a result. > > The problem is that I can't write to the drive (burn cds with > cdrecord) with causing a lost interrupt and then nothing works; > even reads don't respond. > > When I do: > cdrecord -v -tao dev=ATAPI:/dev/hda something.iso > > I get this output: > Cdrecord-Clone 2.01.01a01 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) > 1995-2004 Joerg Schilling > NOTE: this version of cdrecord is an inofficial (modified) release of > cdrecord > and thus may have bugs that are not present in the original > version. > Please send bug reports and support requests to > <cdrtools@packages.debian.org>. > The original author should not be bothered with problems of > this version. > > cdrecord: Warning: Running on Linux-2.6.12-rc6-jw14 > cdrecord: There are unsettled issues with Linux-2.5 and newer. > cdrecord: If you have unexpected problems, please try Linux-2.4 or > Solaris. > TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM > scsidev: 'ATAPI:/dev/hda' > devname: 'ATAPI:/dev/hda' > scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2 > Warning: Using ATA Packet interface. > Warning: The related Linux kernel interface code seems to be > unmaintained.
^^^
> Warning: There is absolutely NO DMA, operations thus are slow.
^^^
What is the result of using "dev=/dev/hda" interface instead (as suggested by Robert)?
Bartlomiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |