Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:38:03 -0700 (PDT) | From | Daniel Walker <> | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance |
| |
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:48:56 PDT, Daniel Walker said: > > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:14 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > to make sure the wide context has not been lost: no way is IRQ threading > > > ever going to be the main or even the preferred mode of operation. > > > > That's depressing .. You not ever submitting IRQ threading upstream ? > > My reading was "in the same sense that NUMA and cpusets aren't the main or > preferred mode of operation". But that's just my reading of it - Ingo may > have meant something else...
I may have miss read it .. The question still stands, because interrupts in threads is a key feature. Other major features depend on it . If he doesn't have intentions to submit that up stream than a good percentage of the rest of the patch isn't going up stream either.
Daniel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |