![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:17:48AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > What's the problem with the sysctl ? If you prefer, I can change the patch > to keep the feature enabled by default so that only people aware of the > problem have to fix it by hand. But I found it better the other way : people > who need the feature enable it by hand. Well that's exactly my problem :) I reckon it should be off by default because the threat posed by this problem is IMHO small compared to some of the other standard threats that are applicable to TCP. Plus this is a well-documented feature so we can't be sure that someone somewhere isn't depending on it. However, if it were off by default then there is very little value in providing it at all since the same thing can be achived easily through netfilter. Anyway, let's leave it to Dave to make the decision. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-13 07:51 [W:0.538 / U:0.920 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||